Foley Automotive Update

Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst

This update helps automotive suppliers inform their legal and operational decisions to help address challenges and opportunities. Contact your Foley relationship partner, or Ann Marie Uetz, Vanessa L. Miller, or Nicholas J. Ellis, to follow up.

Key Developments

Foley & Lardner partner Vanessa Miller and retired partner John Trentacosta published a book titled Law of the Automotive and Manufacturing Supply Chain: A Handbook for Success, which examines the issues, strategies, and challenges brought on by globalization in the supply chain. In it, the authors provide tips and takeaways for companies navigating the growing complexities in this new era. To request a copy, click HERE.
Foley & Lardner partner Nicholas Ellis is quoted in the Law360 article, “End Of UAW Strike Spotlights Supply Chain, EVs’ Future,” commenting on the labor contracts’ potential costs to automakers and their supply base.
Foley & Lardner partner Ann Marie Uetz is quoted in the Crain’s Detroit article, “Auto Suppliers Might Be The Biggest Losers In UAW Strike,” commenting on certain financial and workforce ramifications of the strike.
Foley & Lardner of counsel Mark Neuberger is quoted in the Law360 article, “Labor Deals With Big 3 Automakers Give UAW New Leverage,” commenting on the tentative agreements recently reached between the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the Big Three automakers.
Consulting firm Anderson Economic Group estimates the UAW strike exceeded $10 billion in losses in its sixth and final full week, according to analysis featured in CBS News on November 2. This figure includes $4.3 billion in losses for the Detroit Three, and supplier losses of $3.3 billion.
Crain’s Detroit reports certain auto suppliers intend to increase business diversification amid industry uncertainty following the costly UAW strike and delays in EV rollouts.
The seasonally adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) for total U.S. new-vehicle sales reached 15.5 million units in October, reflecting 14 consecutive months of year-over-year SAAR increases, but falling short of expectations due to month-end weakness. Sales losses from the UAW strike are estimated at 35,000 units, according to preliminary analysis from Ward’s Intelligence.
GM’s self-driving unit Cruise halted both its robotaxi operations across the U.S. and production of the Origin autonomous van in Michigan. The actions come after the California Department of Motor Vehicles suspended Cruise LLC’s permits for testing and deploying driverless vehicles in the state.
Toyota will invest an additional $8 billion in its upcoming hybrid and EV battery plant in North Carolina, which brings the automaker’s total investment in the site to approximately $13.9 billion.
Battery-electric vehicles accounted for 21.5% of all new cars sold in California for the first nine months of 2023, according to the California New Car Dealers Association.
Certain automakers and dealers are using incentives and price reductions for unsold EV inventory.

OEMs/Suppliers

Tentative labor agreements with the UAW will result in higher labor costs for the Detroit Three and potentially raise new-vehicle prices, according to views in the Detroit Free Press and The Wall Street Journal.
Ford estimated its tentative contract with the UAW will result in $850 to $900 in added labor costs per vehicle. The automaker expects to lose $1.3 billion in the third and fourth quarters of this year due to the strike.
Stellantis reported €3 billion ($3.2 billion) in lost revenue and an operating profit loss of under €750 million ($800 million) due to the UAW strike.
Denso will invest approximately $3.3 billion by 2030 to expand its capabilities in semiconductors.
Orders for automotive semiconductors are beginning to slow, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
Canadian union Unifor ratified a new three-year agreement with Stellantis.
Ford will temporarily lay off workers at its Louisville Assembly plant for portions of November due to “parts related issues” which impact production.

Electric Vehicles and Low Emissions Technology

Toyota expects to sell approximately 123,000 full EVs in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024, down from a previous target of 202,000 EVs. The automaker raised its target for hybrids to 3.6 million worldwide, from a previous projection of 3.5 million.
Certain EV models with bidirectional charging could be used in the event of power disruptions. However, consumers may pay a premium to integrate vehicle-to-home capabilities.
Bloomberg reports a number of mobile charging startups are working to develop devices and solutions for EV fleets.
Michigan-based Our Next Energy started pilot production of lithium iron phosphate batteries, and customer deliveries may begin the first half of 2024.
China’s BYD sold 2.37 million plug-in hybrids and EVs worldwide in the first 10 months of this year.

Automated, Autonomous or Connected Vehicles Technologies

A joint venture between Chinese carmaker Geely and search-engine provider Baidu began deliveries in China of an EV model equipped with Level 4 autonomous driving technology.
A report by The Wall Street Journal examines Toyota’s challenges and revised strategies toward in-house software development.
Ann Arbor-based autonomous vehicle company May Mobility closed a $105 million Series D funding round led by Japanese telecommunications company NTT Group.

Market Trends and Regulatory

The National Association of Manufacturers provided an update on its policy actions pertaining to new fuel standards and regulations for light vehicles in areas including harmonizing standards and establishing realistic targets with reasonable timeframes. NAM noted that automakers are facing “multiple sets of standards” with varied compliance timelines from the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and separate standards from California.
Transport Topics reports costs for aftermarket parts and labor fell slightly in the second quarter following a sustained period of rising prices. The analysis notes that rates for labor and parts are expected to remain above pre-pandemic levels until inflationary prices recede.

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.