Melko Quoted in S&P Global About Impact of Oil and Gas Producers’ Bankruptcies on Midstream Businesses
17 June 2020
S&P Global
Partner John Melko was quoted in the S&P Global article, “As upstream bankruptcies loom, oil and gas pipelines brace for contract disputes,” where he discussed how a midstream agreement is structured can have major implications in bankruptcy proceedings.
As more oil and gas producers in the United States file or are expected to file for bankruptcy, midstream firms are preparing for a wave of upstream customers trying to get out of contracts. How a midstream agreement is set up can have major implications for how it is treated during a bankruptcy. For example, midstream gathering and processing agreements are often written as real property interests, as opposed to executory contracts. A real property interest, which is tied to the property, cannot be rejected in bankruptcy; an executory contract obligates the debtor and or another party to fulfill its terms at a later date.
Some covenants, or legal contracts, can “run with the land,” mean that rights or limitations apply to not only current landowners but also to future ones. “It doesn’t give the gathering company an interest in the minerals themselves … but it does give them this covenant — sort of like an easement — that attaches itself to the mineral interest, such that when the oil and gas is produced, it’s committed … to flow through that gathering system,” Melko said.
The devil is often in the details with these types of covenants. Midstream operators have had to grapple with whether they could satisfy “touch and concern” requirements, which involve demonstrating that their covenants impact how the land is used or valued, and whether covenants running with the land have been formally conveyed, or transferred. If done correctly, Melko noted, covenants running with the land are also legally recorded to back up ownership claims.
People
Related News
26 September 2024
In the News
Gregory Marino on NIL Litigation – 'Schools want to know where the line is, and now everything is in flux'
Foley & Lardner LLP special counsel Gregory Marino shared insight on the growing complexities of collegiate sports in the ABA Journal article, "Money and litigation tangle with recent rules for college athletes' NIL deals."
24 September 2024
In the News
Thomas Ferrante Assesses Recent HHS OIG Report on Remote Patient Monitoring
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Thomas Ferrante commented on the recently released report on remote patient monitoring from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) in the Fierce Healthcare article, “HHS watchdog flags potential remote monitoring fraud. Stakeholders say concerns about misuse are overblown.”
20 September 2024
In the News
David Rosen Featured for Insight on Looming FDA Final Rule for Cosmetic Manufacturing
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen is featured by CosmeticsDesign for his insights on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's final rule establishing Good Manufacturing Practices for the cosmetics industry in the article, "Preparing for MoCRA’s 2025 cGMP deadline: What cosmetic manufacturers and suppliers need to know."