Partner Aaron Tantleff was quoted in a Law360 article, “5 Common Myths About EU’s New Data Protection Regime,” about some of the misconceptions that surround the European Union’s looming new General Data Protection Regulation.
Tantleff said most companies have business operations that touch the EU in some way and are therefore caught up by the regulation’s wide net, even if no one from the company has ever set foot in Europe. “Generally speaking, GDPR is extraterritorial and applies to companies all over, and while that may be concerning and frustrating to companies that don’t think EU data protection authorities should be able to come after them, they still have to comply,” he said.
He also said moving data processing operations out of Europe or leaving the EU market altogether may not be practical for many companies and could end up causing additional headaches. “Offering differential privacy and security where certain protections are offered in one location but not the other is dangerous territory,” he said. “It has the potential to raise the ire of regulators, who may want to know why their citizens’ data is being treated differently and their people are deemed to have less rights than those in the EU,” he said.
Tantleff said most companies have business operations that touch the EU in some way and are therefore caught up by the regulation’s wide net, even if no one from the company has ever set foot in Europe. “Generally speaking, GDPR is extraterritorial and applies to companies all over, and while that may be concerning and frustrating to companies that don’t think EU data protection authorities should be able to come after them, they still have to comply,” he said.
He also said moving data processing operations out of Europe or leaving the EU market altogether may not be practical for many companies and could end up causing additional headaches. “Offering differential privacy and security where certain protections are offered in one location but not the other is dangerous territory,” he said. “It has the potential to raise the ire of regulators, who may want to know why their citizens’ data is being treated differently and their people are deemed to have less rights than those in the EU,” he said.
People
Related News
20 December 2024
In the News
Foley Attorneys Explore Alice Patent Eligibility Analysis Divergence
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys Jack Carroll, Chethan Srinivasa, and Kevin Malaney authored the IP Litigator article, "Alice Patent Eligibility Analysis Divergence Before USPTO and District Court."
19 December 2024
In the News
Jason Mehta Shares Perspective on Biggest Government Contracts Cases of 2024
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Jason Mehta commented on the legal battle over the constitutionality of the False Claims Act's qui tam provision in the Law360 article, "Top Gov't Contracts Cases Of 2024."
19 December 2024
In the News
Key Rulings On Sentencing Guidelines After Loper Bright
The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are instrumental in criminal sentencing, as they provide courts with advisory ranges for imposing sentences.