Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
15 December 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
27 August 2024
In the News
Samuel Goldstick Assesses Data Privacy Challenges for Automakers
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Samuel Goldstick underscored how disclosure can help automakers reduce legal risk in the Automotive Dive article, "Automakers face growing data privacy challenges, experts say."
26 August 2024
In the News
Judith Waltz Quoted on Inflation Reduction Act, Pharma Impact
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Judith Waltz is quoted in the PharmaVoice article, "Pharmas’ IRA court losses mount. They keep pursuing them."
20 August 2024
In the News
Kevin Hyde Featured in Q&A on Jacksonville Legal Market – 'The outlook is good'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kevin Hyde is featured in a Capital Analytics Associates Q&A on the major achievements of Foley's Jacksonville office, key trends in the legal market, and the firm's commitment to its talent and client service.