Block FMLA leave has its own challenges. But intermittent FMLA leave can be downright painful – including the fact that intermittent leave claims are the most common type of lawsuit under the FMLA.
When employees need to take scheduled time off for an entire day, week, or even month, an employer has more notice and ability to find ways to make sure the employee’s work is still being done. However, when employees get valid certification for intermittent leave, the employer often will have no idea when the need for leave will arise or even how much time in a given day an employee may be out.
The following are some practical guidelines for dealing with these tricky situations:
- Keep track of FMLA usage for all employees, including those on intermittent leave. Tracking such leave is not always easy, but doing so consistently and in an organized way will ensure that employees do not use more time than allowed. You should always require employees who are using intermittent FMLA leave to identify the absence as FMLA-related. Train supervisors to let HR (or Leave Administration) know of any such absences.
- Insist that certification forms be completed as frequently as permitted by the FMLA.
- You can request a new medical certification from the employee at the start of each FMLA year and should do so.
- Once intermittent leave is approved under the FMLA, watch for suspicious absences. If strange patterns develop (such as always being off on Mondays or Fridays), it could suggest a change that allows you to request a recertification.
- Encourage your employees on intermittent leave to schedule their treatments for medical conditions in a way that causes the least disruption to work. If the position is busiest first thing in the morning, and the employee can schedule a dialysis procedure in the mid- or late afternoon, ask the employee to do so. While you cannot deny FMLA-related absences, it is legal to try to schedule such absences to avoid business disruptions.
- Consider moving an employee on intermittent leave to another job. Temporary transfers are lawful in intermittent leave circumstances when the need for leave is foreseeable. You must still make sure the pay and benefits are the same, but this option can help with work efficiencies.
- If your company has a standard call-in procedure for time off work, make sure to:
- Reference the call-in procedure in your written FMLA policy.
- Consistently enforce the call-in procedure (for all FMLA-related and non-FMLA-related absences). Your policy may require the employee to call a specific number or contact a specific individual about the absence. You can also require that the employee call – and not text – a specific person.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
23 December 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Employment Decision-Making: What’s on the Horizon for 2025
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topEmployment law in 2024 could aptly be summarized as the “Year of Artificial Intelligence Legislation.
23 December 2024
Health Care Law Today
Medicare Telehealth Flexibilities Get a Three-Month Lifeline
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topAfter much uncertainty, Congress has extended many Medicare telehealth flexibilities through March 31, 2025, in its end-of-year appropriations bill.
20 December 2024
Health Care Law Today
GLP-1 Drugs: FDA “Re-Confirms” Decision Removing Tirzepatide from the Drug Shortage List
On December 19, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Declaratory Order reevaluating and re-confirming that the tirzepatide drug shortage has been resolved. This order revoked and replaced FDA’s October 2, 2024, decision on tirzepatide.