Finding Synergy: How KSR v. Teleflex Will Affect Patent Prosecution in the Electrical and Mechanical Arts
26 August 2008
In KSR International Co. v. Telejlex Inc, the Supreme Court held that the test for obviousness used by the Federal Circuit was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. §103 and Supreme Court precedent. Specifically, the Court held that the Federal Circuit gave too much weight to the “teaching, suggestion and motivation” test (TSM) which requires a specific finding of some motivation, teaching, or suggestion to combine prior art teachings in the particular manner claimed before a claim may be found invalid.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
30 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
Controlling Entities to Dealer Contracts Subject to Puerto Rico’s Law 75 May Be Liable for Tortious Interference
Plaintiffs asserting claims for tortious interference of contracts covered by Puerto Rico’s Dealer’s Contracts Act, commonly known as Law 75, may automatically satisfy one element of such a claim. Law 75 regulates relationships between distributors and manufacturers.
27 December 2024
Nationwide Injunction Reinstated: Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Paused
23 December 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Employment Decision-Making: What’s on the Horizon for 2025
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topEmployment law in 2024 could aptly be summarized as the “Year of Artificial Intelligence Legislation.