Making Non-Obviousness More Obvious After KSR v. Teleflex: The Technology-Landscape Approach
26 August 2008
Non-obviousness is “the fundamental gatekeeper to patentability” in the United States because it “weed[s] out” trivial improvements that are merely “new in the sense that the same thing has not been made before.” So an obvious change “devoid of ingenuity” is not patentable. Unfortunately, judging what is “obvious” is often not obvious.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
23 December 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Employment Decision-Making: What’s on the Horizon for 2025
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topEmployment law in 2024 could aptly be summarized as the “Year of Artificial Intelligence Legislation.
23 December 2024
Injunction Stayed: Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Resumes
The U.S. Department of Justice scored a victory in ongoing litigation over the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) when the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the nationwide preliminary injunction issued earlier this month by a federal district court in Texas.
23 December 2024
Health Care Law Today
Medicare Telehealth Flexibilities Get a Three-Month Lifeline
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topAfter much uncertainty, Congress has extended many Medicare telehealth flexibilities through March 31, 2025, in its end-of-year appropriations bill.