During the presentation we will review the Supreme Court’s ruling about “personal benefit” and a corporate insider’s breach of fiduciary duty, and discuss the current state of insider trading law.
This presentation will also cover topics such as:
- An overview of the law on insider trading pre-Salman, including cases since Newman
- A discussion of the background, facts, and holding in Salman
- The implications for future civil and criminal insider trading cases following Salman (and Dirks)
- What constitutes a “friend” in assessing whether the gifting insider received a personal benefit?
- How do you know if tipped MNPI will be considered a personal benefit to the insider and a breach of his/her fiduciary duty where the tippee is neither friend nor relative?
- The takeaways: What does Salman teach about foreseeing insider trading liability
There is no cost to participate in this program, but pre-registration is required. To participate, please use the Register button. Instructions for accessing the program will be included in the registration confirmation email.
If you have questions or would like more information, please contact Kayla Huven at [email protected].
People
Related Insights
19 November 2024
Events
Privacy Law Issues Confronting the Cannabis and Hemp Economy
Foley Partner Aaron Tantleff joins the faculty for a California Lawyers Association (CLA) webinar aimed at providing California lawyers with an introduction to privacy law concepts and issues that intersect with commercial cannabis and hemp.
13 November 2024
Events
Florida Institute of CFOs (fiCFO) 2024 Summit
Foley Partner Aaron Tantleff is a featured speaker at the Florida Institute of CFOs (fiCFO) 2024 Summit taking place near Orlando on November 12-14, 2024, which Foley is proud to support as a Platinum Sponsor.
14 November 2024
Events
ABA Antitrust Law Section Fall Forum Debate: Anticompetitive Conduct is Best Determined by the FTC
During the Fall Forum of the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, Partner Diane Hazel will moderate a debate that will argue the pros and cons of whether anticompetitive conduct is best determined by the FTC.