Expert Network Best Practices, Part II: Interpreting the SEC’s Risk Alert on MNPI
14 July 2022
Foley Partner Jim Lundy will join an ACA Group panel of subject-matter experts to examine the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Examinations recent risk alert highlighting common deficiencies in material non-public information (MNPI) observed during examinations. The panelists will discuss why these deficiencies are so common and how your firm can avoid making the same mistakes.
Key learning objectives:
- Rules about the use of Expert Networks and other research
- Use of alternative data outlined in the risk alert
- Application of the SEC’s “shadow trading” theory
- How your advisors and vendors can help you comply
In addition to Jim Lundy, the speakers include:
- Carlo di Florio, Chief Services Officer, ACA Group
- Dan Campbell, Director, ACA Group
- Jason Howard, GC/CCO, Tegus
There is no charge to attend this webinar. To register, click here.
People
Related Insights
20 November 2024
Events
November 2024 Midwest Cyber Security Alliance Meeting | Resilience Awakens: Tapping Into Your Inner Force for Managing Stress Effectively
Join us on Wednesday, November 20, 2024, for a very special Midwest Cyber Security Alliance meeting offering a unique, interactive approach to mental wellness, helping professionals thrive in high-stress environments like cybersecurity.
11 November 2024
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term business strategies, investments, partnerships, and technology. Contact the authors, your Foley relationship partner, or our Automotive Team to discuss and learn more.
11 November 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Recent California Federal Court Decision Indicates That Determining Whether an Employment Agreement Illegally Restrains Lawful Employment Can Be a Fact-Intensive Inquiry Requiring Discovery
In a recent decision issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, a federal court in California was tasked with determining whether dismissal of a cause of action for tortious interference with contract at the outset of a case is appropriate where the underlying contract arguably contained restrictive covenants in violation of California Business & Professions Code section 16600.