Foley Partner Gardner Davis and Senior Counsel Danielle Whitley authored an article titled “NOL and void” in the April 5, 2010 issue of The Deal. The authors discuss a Delaware Court of Chancery decision that upheld Selectica Inc.’s selection of a shareholder rights plan, or poison pill, as a tool to protect its net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs), remarking that it is the first time that a Delaware court has reviewed a board’s decision to adopt a poison pill intended to guard NOLs. They add that the decision should not be interpreted as support for the suggestion that a board can safely adopt a poison pill in every circumstance, noting the court’s acknowledgment that shareholder rights plans must be subject to careful review.
Author(s)
Related Insights
31 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
SEC Enforcement Action Against Church & Dwight Director: Lessons for Outside Directors
The SEC’s settlement with James R. Craigie, former CEO, chairman, and director of Church & Dwight Co. Inc., for violating proxy disclosure rules by standing for election as an independent director without disclosing his close personal friendship with a senior Church & Dwight executive has caused consternation in the legal community regarding when a friendship jeopardizes director independence under stock exchange rules.
31 December 2024
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
The State of the Law of Requirements Contracts
Amid increasing pressure on supply chains across the globe, multiple recent court opinions have disrupted the law of requirements contracts.
30 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
Controlling Entities to Dealer Contracts Subject to Puerto Rico’s Law 75 May Be Liable for Tortious Interference
Plaintiffs asserting claims for tortious interference of contracts covered by Puerto Rico’s Dealer’s Contracts Act, commonly known as Law 75, may automatically satisfy one element of such a claim. Law 75 regulates relationships between distributors and manufacturers.