Is your institution providing clear and conspicuous notice of fees? Are you consistently reviewing company marketing materials to ensure that all claims are accurate and supported with adequate substantiation?
The Florida Attorney General announced that Florida has entered into settlement agreements with five prepaid debit card companies following an investigation into allegations that consumers supposedly were deceived about fees and misled into believing that using the prepaid cards would improve their credit scores. All the prepaid companies denied any wrongdoing but agreed to pay a combined total of $115,000 to a charitable organization as a part of the settlements. The prepaid card companies also paid the Attorney General’s costs and fees related to the action.
Notably, consumer complaints played a key role in the Florida Attorney General’s decision to take up the investigation of these prepaid card companies. This is a reminder to use consumer complaints to identify potential UDAAP issues with your advertising, products, or services.
Notably, consumer complaints played a key role in the Florida Attorney General’s decision to take up the investigation of these prepaid card companies. This is a reminder to use consumer complaints to identify potential UDAAP issues with your advertising, products, or services.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Related Insights
23 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Company Should Know About…Tariff Strategies for Sell-Side Contracts
With the size and scope of President Trump’s tariffs continuing to shift, this is a critical time for businesses to assess their contracts and determine how increased tariff costs might adversely affect profitability, and whether there are any strategies to mitigate the losses.
22 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
Health Care Marketing: The Seventh Circuit Addresses “Referrals” Under The Anti-Kickback Statute
The case, United States v. Sorenson, addressed whether a Medicare-registered distributor violated the AKS in making payments to advertising, marketing, and manufacturing companies that worked to sell orthopedic braces to Medicare patients. The court held that such payments were not “referrals” within the meaning of the AKS because the payments were made to entities that were neither physicians in a position to refer their patients nor other decisionmakers in positions to “leverage fluid, informal power and influence” over health care decisions.
22 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CMS Extends Medicare Revalidation Deadline
On April 17, 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced another extension of the deadline by which skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) must revalidate their Medicare enrollments.