According to the research, manufacturers are on the move. The questions and considerations listed below are a great starting point for any company opening or relocating a manufacturing facility.
Is the right support infrastructure in place?
- Transportation – Will railroads, airports, seaports, or interstate highways be needed for the plant?
- Utilities – Some of our clients have incurred substantial costs to upgrade the community’s existing infrastructure to handle their new plants’ demands. Examples include augmenting local sanitation, wastewater, or storm water discharge capabilities.
What about the labor force?
- Union/Right to Work – Employers seeking less expensive labor often consider locating in a “right-to-work” state. Our clients often choose to locate in “right-to-work” states to enjoy increased flexibility in wages, staffing, and operating methods.
- Requisite Skills – Generally speaking, cities and regions’ laborers differ in relative levels of education and types of skills. If the labor force does not possess the requisite candidates, could training or education bridge the gap?
- Training –To encourage companies to hire and train their citizens, some state and local governments may offer training grants and tax incentives. Further, many states now actively incent community colleges and universities to discount or develop specific training programs. Many states also provide active workforce boards which help companies locate and recruit employees with suitable skills.
Will the location benefit your supply chain?
- Proximity to Natural Resources – Transportation and storage costs can often be reduced if essential production materials are nearby.
- Proximity to Customers/Suppliers – In addition to cost-savings, companies may be able to achieve agility and efficiency through business practices like just-in-time inventory.
Is the regulatory climate a good fit?
- Zoning/Permitting – Permits may be required for construction, operation, water usage, waste water discharge permits, air quality control, and emissions etc.. Companies must also consider if they will need or be subject to easements for access roads or utilities.
- Environmental – Potential uses may be restricted by environmental considerations. Even if not prohibited, permits may be required or impact fees assessed for certain activities, like carbon emission or wetland mitigation. On the other hand, redeveloping contaminated sites can often yield significant government incentives.
Will you receive government incentives?
- Federal – Some countries offer federal tax and financial incentives for companies developing new manufacturing plants. In the U.S., community development block grants, tax-free bonds, and investment tax credits are often available, and U.S. tax deductions may be available for green, LEED-certified, or other energy-efficient plants.
- State/Local – Many U.S. states offer incentives for manufacturers to operate in enterprise zones or special economic zones. Additionally, tax breaks or discounted financing may be available for the construction of a plant and the purchase of other fixtures and equipment.
What are the systemic risks?
- Economy and Currency – The stability of a country’s economy and currency significantly impact the continuity of operations and the cost of importing/exporting materials and products.
- The Regulatory Process – While U.S. jurisdictions provide fair and open regulatory processes, a company should become familiar with a country’s regulatory process before opening a facility. Some foreign regulatory processes may encourage or require companies to take actions that run afoul of U.S. laws, like the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
- Barriers to Trade – Some country’s use tariffs or other measures to protect resident businesses. Companies should consider whether these would be a boon or a bane, depending on their customers’ locations.
Of course, each company is different; considerations may vary. Just remember, the location of a manufacturing facility could provide a competitive advantage, so choose wisely.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Related Insights
14 January 2025
Health Care Law Today
Massachusetts: New Year, New Law — Governor Signs “An Act enhancing the market review process” (House Bill No. 5159)
On January 8, 2025, Governor Maura Healey signed into law H.B. 5159, “an Act enhancing the market review process.”
13 January 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Illinois Human Rights Act Now Protects Employees With “Family Responsibilities”
As of January 1, 2025, Illinois became the latest in a minority of states and municipalities to expand employment protections for employees who act as family caregivers.
13 January 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Complying With Recent Guidance From Delaware Courts Regarding Enforcement of Noncompetes
In line with the national trend making noncompetes more difficult to enforce, a number of Delaware courts have recently refused to “blue pencil” overbroad noncompetition agreements and have stricken them in their entirety.