As we have noted in prior posts, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) has been aggressively pursuing I-9 inspections and imposing record fines (about $12.5 million per year) as part of its multi-year strategic plan. Employers should not turn a blind eye to this uptick in enforcement activity and would be wise to fight back by improving their compliance. One of the top concerns must be timely completion of the Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification. An employer has a very short period in which to complete the I-9 process with the new hire: by the first day of employment for section 1 (the employee’s section) and by the third business day after employment begins for section 2 (the employer’s section). Late I-9 Forms constitute substantive violations. An employer cannot avoid a substantive violation by arguing that it tried to comply in good faith.
In response to these stringent requirements, some employers are beginning the I-9 process before the first day of a new hire’s employment. While the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will permit this approach, early I-9 completion is not a perfect solution. Indeed, an employer can trigger new violations if it is not careful. Here are some tips for employers who wish to start the I-9 process early:
- Never ask to complete the Form I-9 until after the job applicant has accepted the job offer: The antidiscrimination rules prohibit an employer from using I-9 completion to screen out job applicants. The employer first must decide that it wishes to hire the applicant. After the job applicant accepts the job offer, the employer may begin the I-9 process.
- Implement this process uniformly: Ask all individuals who have accepted a job offer to start the I-9 process before the first day of employment. Selective requests for early I-9 completion may lead to discrimination charges and fines under the I-9 rules.
- For E-Verify employers, follow the E-Verify rules after early I-9 completion: E-Verify employers may open an E-Verify case inquiry after the Form I-9 is completed. If the E-Verify case inquiry is opened before employment begins and the E-Verify result is a Tentative Nonconfirmation (“TNC”) or DHS/SSA hold, it is possible that the E-Verify inquiry will not be resolved by the planned start date. The employer cannot delay the start of employment when the new hire is still within the period allowed by the E-Verify program for resolving the E-Verify case inquiry.
- Do not begin the I-9 process too far ahead of the employment start date: There should not be a significant gap between early completion of Form I-9 and the start of employment. Significant gaps create the potential for incorrect or missing entries on the I-9 Form (e.g., the start date may be unknown or change, and the employer may fail to update section 2 of the I-9 Form with the correct information). The job applicant also may change his mind, which will cause the employer to have I-9 Forms for individuals who were never employees. For E-Verify employers, the DOJ and DHS’s E-Verify Monitoring and Compliance Branch may become concerned that the employer is misusing E-Verify. These agencies may investigate whether the employer is using early I-9 and E-Verify completion to screen job applicants, rather than to verify employment authorization following a legitimate, accepted job offer.
- Allow the new hire three business days after the start of employment to present a List A document OR a List B document and a List C document from the I-9 List of Acceptable Documents (verifying identity and employment eligibility). The I-9 rules permit the employer up to three business days after employment commences to complete section 2 by entering information about the new hire’s document(s) under List A OR List B and List C. It is possible that the new hire may certify in section 1 that he is authorized to work in the United States, but not present the identity and employment eligibility document(s) before the first day of work. An employer may encourage the new hire to present the document(s) of his choice as soon as possible. If he does not do so, the best practice is to allow the new hire the full period (three business days after employment begins) to present the I-9 document(s). If the new hire does not produce qualifying document(s) by the end of the three business days, the employer may terminate for failing to complete the I-9 verification process.
Finally, timely completion is only one part of I-9 compliance. What is stated on the I-9 Form is as important as when it is stated. Timely and properly completed I-9 Forms are the key to avoiding significant fines during an I-9 inspection by ICE.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
20 December 2024
Health Care Law Today
GLP-1 Drugs: FDA “Re-Confirms” Decision Removing Tirzepatide from the Drug Shortage List
On December 19, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Declaratory Order reevaluating and re-confirming that the tirzepatide drug shortage has been resolved. This order revoked and replaced FDA’s October 2, 2024, decision on tirzepatide.
20 December 2024
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Christmas Came Early: Justice Delivered in Supplier Dispute Over Unjust Enrichment
The AirBoss saga continues… This holiday season, AirBoss Flexible Products Co. received a monumental legal victory, righting a costly wrong in MSSC, Inc. v. AirBoss.
19 December 2024
Health Care Law Today
HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Amendments: Compliance in an Uncertain Enforcement Landscape
The amendments to the HIPAA Privacy Rule designed to protect reproductive health care information are under legal challenge as the compliance date quickly approaches.