Senior Counsel Alissa Nann contributed an article to Law360 on March 4, 2016, “How Will the High Court Define ‘Actual Fraud’?” In the article, Nann discussed the Supreme Court case, Husky International Electronics v. Ritz, in which the court will decide whether the discharge exception for “actual fraud” requires the debtor to have made a false representation to the creditor. Nann provided insights on the oral arguments of case and offered two main takeaways.
Author(s)
Related Insights
30 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
Controlling Entities to Dealer Contracts Subject to Puerto Rico’s Law 75 May Be Liable for Tortious Interference
Plaintiffs asserting claims for tortious interference of contracts covered by Puerto Rico’s Dealer’s Contracts Act, commonly known as Law 75, may automatically satisfy one element of such a claim. Law 75 regulates relationships between distributors and manufacturers.
27 December 2024
Nationwide Injunction Reinstated: Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Paused
23 December 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Employment Decision-Making: What’s on the Horizon for 2025
Share on TwitterShare by EmailShareBack to topEmployment law in 2024 could aptly be summarized as the “Year of Artificial Intelligence Legislation.