As the final article of this three-part series, partners David Ralston and Frank Murray published a Thomson Reuters Practical Law practice note, “Government Contracts: Agency-Level Bid Protests,” which ran on April 21, 2017.
In tandem with the first two articles of this three-part series that analyze the bid protests from the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), this third part thoroughly explains bid protests at the federal government agency level. It dives into the protests filed by prospective bidders and why these bidders are dissatisfied with the terms the agencies are putting forward. It also compares and contrasts agency-level bid protests with those filed with the GAO and COFC.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
In tandem with the first two articles of this three-part series that analyze the bid protests from the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), this third part thoroughly explains bid protests at the federal government agency level. It dives into the protests filed by prospective bidders and why these bidders are dissatisfied with the terms the agencies are putting forward. It also compares and contrasts agency-level bid protests with those filed with the GAO and COFC.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
Author(s)
Related Insights
31 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
SEC Enforcement Action Against Church & Dwight Director: Lessons for Outside Directors
The SEC’s settlement with James R. Craigie, former CEO, chairman, and director of Church & Dwight Co. Inc., for violating proxy disclosure rules by standing for election as an independent director without disclosing his close personal friendship with a senior Church & Dwight executive has caused consternation in the legal community regarding when a friendship jeopardizes director independence under stock exchange rules.
31 December 2024
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
The State of the Law of Requirements Contracts
Amid increasing pressure on supply chains across the globe, multiple recent court opinions have disrupted the law of requirements contracts.
30 December 2024
Foley Viewpoints
Controlling Entities to Dealer Contracts Subject to Puerto Rico’s Law 75 May Be Liable for Tortious Interference
Plaintiffs asserting claims for tortious interference of contracts covered by Puerto Rico’s Dealer’s Contracts Act, commonly known as Law 75, may automatically satisfy one element of such a claim. Law 75 regulates relationships between distributors and manufacturers.