DOJ Shows its Commitment to Cybersecurity Enforcement Through the False Claims Act

At one time, False Claims Act (FCA) investigations and enforcement actions were largely focused on health care and defense contracts. While those two areas continue to dominate the FCA landscape, cybersecurity has emerged as a hot area not only for whistleblowers but also for U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors. Several recent developments illustrate this trend and signal that cybersecurity enforcement through the FCA will only increase.

In 2021, the DOJ launched its Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative, which seeks to use the FCA to prosecute cybersecurity-related fraud committed by government contractors and grant recipients. Since its launch, the DOJ has announced multiple settlements under the FCA.

The following recent developments underscore the DOJ’s interest in this area:

Earlier this year, the DOJ intervened in an FCA matter initiated by two whistleblowers, which alleged that Georgia Tech Research Corporation and the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) violated various cybersecurity requirements that are part of Department of Defense contracts.

In May 2024, the DOJ announced a US$2.7 million settlement with Insight Global LLC. The matter involved whistleblower allegations that the company failed to implement sufficient cybersecurity measures to protect health information collected as part of COVID-19 contact tracing. These failures allegedly violated the FCA and included allegations that the company had not responded in a timely manner to concerns raised internally regarding the security failures. Notably, the contract at issue was a state contract that used federal funds.

In June 2024, DOJ announced an US$11.3 million settlement with two consulting companies that allegedly violated the FCA by failing to comply with cybersecurity requirements as part of a federally-funded state contract to facilitate applications for federal rental assistance. This matter also began with a whistleblower complaint.

Given the emergence of cybersecurity as an area of focus within the FCA, organizations should focus on the following action items to enhance cybersecurity compliance and reduce FCA risk:

Catalogue and monitor compliance with all government-imposed cybersecurity standards. This includes not only ongoing knowledge of the organization’s contracts, but also continuously monitoring and assessing the organization’s cybersecurity program to identify and patch vulnerabilities and to assess compliance with those contractual cybersecurity standards.
Developing and maintaining a robust and effective compliance program. In such a program, employees are encouraged to report concerns, and those concerns are investigated promptly and escalated as appropriate.
Where non-compliance with cybersecurity standards is identified, organizations should evaluate potential next steps. This includes whether to disclose the matter to the government and cooperate with government investigators. Organizations should work with experienced counsel in this regard. Proactively mapping out a strategy for investigating and responding to potential non-compliance can instill discipline to the process and streamline the organization’s approach.

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.