Cybersecurity in the Age of Industry 4.0 - Part 2

This is the second article in our two-part series on Cybersecurity in the Age of Industry 4.0, focusing on the legal implications and potential liabilities manufacturers face from cyberattacks, as well as practical recommendations to mitigate these risks. If you missed the first article, where we discussed the latest trends and key cybersecurity risks facing manufacturers, you can read it here: Cybersecurity in the Age of Industry 4.0 – Part 1.

Legal Implications and Potential Liabilities

The legal implications of cybersecurity attacks and associated risks are vast, including significant financial and legal liabilities from various sources.

First, manufacturers may face liability based on data protection laws if a cybersecurity attack involves a personal data breach. For example, if a manufacturing company controls large amounts of personal data, including customer or employee data, it would be subject to data protection laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) in the United States. A data breach that exposes or results from non-compliance with data protection laws could result in significant regulatory fines and penalties. For instance, the GDPR imposes significant financial penalties for non-compliance, up to 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher. Additionally, manufacturers may face considerable liability arising from class actions filed by affected individuals.

Second, directors and officers of manufacturing companies could face legal action from shareholders based on an alleged breach of fiduciary duties. Such duties include the duty of care, which could be interpreted as an obligation to implement reasonable cybersecurity measures in the context of cybersecurity and allocate sufficient budgetary resources to support those measures. If a cybersecurity attack results in significant financial loss and the shareholders can show that directors and officers failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, they could be held liable for breaching the duty of care. Similarly, if a cybersecurity attack results from a failure to properly vet and monitor a supplier or other third party’s cybersecurity policies and procedures, manufacturers may face potential claims alleging a breach of the required duty of care. Shareholders may also file lawsuits alleging that negligence of the directors and officers resulted in financial loss.

Third, if a cybersecurity attack involves the loss or disclosure of IP, especially in the case of industrial espionage, a company may be found to be in violation of trade secret laws or be subject to IP lawsuits if the cybersecurity attack results in the theft and subsequent disclosure and/or unauthorized use of proprietary information.

Finally, under contract law, manufacturers could be held liable for breach of contract if a cybersecurity attack disrupts their ability to fulfill contractual obligations. Additionally, contracts often contain clauses related to required data protection and cybersecurity. This could lead to various legal consequences, including termination of contracts and liability for any resulting damages.

Recommendations for Manufacturers to Further Manage Cybersecurity Risks

We have already identified a number of strategies to mitigate the risks associated with the increased adoption of Industry 4.0 technology. These include:

Adopt Security by Design Principles. Manufacturers should adopt Security by Design principles during the IoT planning and integration process to ensure robust security measures are embedded from the outset. This involves incorporating security at every stage of the device and system development lifecycle, from design and implementation to deployment. Regular security audits and vulnerability assessments should be conducted to identify and mitigate potential threats early.

Implement Comprehensive Vendor Management Processes. Conducting thorough due diligence during vendor selection is essential to ensure vendors meet stringent cybersecurity standards, including cybersecurity posture assessments and compliance with industry regulations. Manufacturers should also establish clear contractual agreements that outline cybersecurity expectations, responsibilities, consequences for non-compliance, and permit continuous monitoring of the security posture of vendors.

Develop a Plan to Address the Challenges Posed by Legacy Systems. This involves conducting regular risk assessments to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities, segmenting and isolating legacy systems from the main network to limit potential breaches, and considering virtualization or encapsulation techniques to enhance security. Importantly, this also requires developing a modernization plan that includes budgeting for upgrades, identifying suitable replacements, and training staff on new technologies to maintain operational resilience.

Reframe Cybersecurity as an Integral Part of the Overall Business Strategy. Cybersecurity should be viewed not merely as a cost but as a necessary strategic investment that protects organizational assets and ensures business continuity. Better justification and allocation of necessary resources to cybersecurity initiatives is required. Adopting cybersecurity frameworks and benchmarks such as ISO 27001 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework can help assess and communicate the value of cybersecurity investments effectively.

Employ Technical Measures. Technical measures are the first line of defense against cybersecurity risks. Manufacturers should review their cybersecurity policies and procedures and ensure proper technical security measures are implemented and followed. Such measures include implementing multi-factor authentication, utilizing modern endpoint detection solutions, ensuring comprehensive business continuity and backup procedures, regularly updating and patching systems, conducting regular security audits, and training employees on cybersecurity best practices. Additionally, manufacturers should strive to comply with applicable cybersecurity standards such as ISO 27001 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, as these standards provide guidelines and best practices for managing cybersecurity risks. Achieving and maintaining these certifications can demonstrate that the company has taken reasonable steps to protect against cybersecurity threats.

Employee Training and Awareness. Employees often represent the most significant, and most difficult to manage, vulnerability in an organization’s cybersecurity defenses. As such, regular employee training and awareness campaigns are crucial. Training should educate employees about the nature of cyber threats, the importance of cybersecurity measures, and their role in defending against them. Topics can include the importance of strong, unique passwords, the risks of phishing attacks, and the correct procedures for handling, storing, and sharing sensitive data.

Incident Response Planning:In addition to preventive measures, manufacturers should develop and regularly update an incident response plan. This plan should outline the steps to be taken in the event of a cybersecurity incident, including communication strategies, containment procedures, and recovery steps.

Cyber Insurance. Manufacturers should also invest in cyber insurance to mitigate financial risks associated with cybersecurity attacks, including the costs to investigate, remediate, and respond to such attacks, negotiations and ransom payments, and potential litigation that may arise.

Collaboration with Legal Counsel. Manufacturers face not only a multitude of cybersecurity risks but must also navigate the complex patchwork of cybersecurity and data privacy laws at the state, federal, international, and industry-specific levels. These often-complicated laws can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction, industry, and the type of data a company handles. Legal counsel can identify the applicability and ensure compliance with laws like the GDPR, CPRA, and other comprehensive data privacy laws, including cybersecurity requirements imposed by the federal government under the SEC’s Cybersecurity Disclosure Rule, the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA), the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and other industry-specific regulations.

Legal counsel can also help identify potential liabilities and legal risks related to cybersecurity. This may include facilitating risk assessments, developing risk management strategies, including policies and procedures to mitigate cybersecurity risks, and preparing and executing an appropriate incident response plan following a cybersecurity incident to ensure compliance with applicable data breach privacy laws. Legal counsel can also assist in reviewing and revising contracts with suppliers, service providers, and customers to ensure the inclusion of appropriate cybersecurity requirements and protections, such as indemnification clauses or limitations of liability in the event of a cybersecurity incident. Finally, legal counsel involved and well-versed in a manufacturer’s cybersecurity practices and procedures can more effectively assist in the event of litigation, whether from affected individuals, business partners, or regulators.

By implementing these recommendations, manufacturers can significantly enhance their cybersecurity posture, protect their operations and data, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

The digital transformation propelled by Industry 4.0 in the manufacturing industry, including the growing adoption of AI, unquestionably brings significant advantages and opportunities for growth and innovation. However, this transformation also continues to introduce significant cybersecurity challenges. The rising incidence of cyberattacks, including ransomware, social engineering, and APTs, and the increasing sophistication of these threats highlight the urgent need for manufacturers to implement comprehensive cybersecurity strategies tailored to their unique vulnerabilities. These strategies should encompass robust technical measures, proactive risk management, and continuous adaptation to evolving threats.

Manufacturers must recognize cybersecurity as a strategic investment rather than a cost center. By integrating cybersecurity into the overall business strategy and adopting industry standards and frameworks, manufacturers can better justify and allocate resources to protect their assets and ensure business continuity. Advanced technologies like AI and IoT should be leveraged to enhance operational efficiency while simultaneously securing these systems against potential cyber threats.

In conclusion, the manufacturing sector must prioritize cybersecurity to safeguard its operations, intellectual property, and reputation. Proactive risk management, continuous improvement of cybersecurity strategies, and adherence to industry standards will not only protect against current threats but also prepare manufacturers for future challenges. Embracing these measures will enhance the sector’s resilience, ensuring sustained growth and competitiveness in the digital age.

2024 Manufacturing Manual

As you navigate the rapidly-evolving manufacturing landscape, the pace of change – from digital disruption to supply chain resiliency to the ubiquity of AI – has never been greater. In Foley’s 2024 Manufacturing Manual, authors from diverse practices and perspectives will release weekly articles that provide a comprehensive “end-to-end” analysis of the manufacturing industry’s legal landscape. Our passion is empowering manufacturers to navigate a rapidly changing world with confidence and agility by providing the knowledge, insights, and legal strategies you need to flourish. We hope this Manufacturing Manual helps you unlock new opportunities for growth, innovation, and success.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.