Aude S. Peden

Associate

Aude Peden, Ph.D., helps domestic and international life sciences innovators protect their valuable biotechnology, pharmaceutical, dietary supplement, and cosmetic intellectual property assets. Her past academic research experience gives her insight into the time, effort, challenges, creativity, and interdisciplinary thinking that gives rise to innovative technologies, allowing her to provide practical strategic advice for both defensive and offensive patent protection.

Aude’s practice focuses on patent counseling and procurement, freedom-to-operate analysis, counseling on infringement and invalidity issues, and due diligence as part of licensing and merger and acquisition negotiations. The companies she works with develop technology in a variety of fields, including genetically modified organisms, such as mammals and microorganisms; genetically modified cells, such as stem cells and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for use in immunotherapy; recombinant molecules, such as small molecules, antibodies, and genes; vaccines, such as peptides, DNA, or mRNA vaccines; dietary supplements; diagnostic molecules; clean technology (recombinant microorganisms); and cosmetics. She is a member of the Chemical, Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Practice.

Prior to joining Foley, Aude was an intern in the Office of the General Counsel and Office for Interactions with Industry at Partners HealthCare System (now known as Mass General Brigham). Prior to law school, Aude was an academic research scientist at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the University of Texas, Knoxville. She also served as an intern in the Office of the General Counsel and Office for Interactions with Industry at Partners HealthCare System (now known as Mass General Brigham).

Representative Experience

  • Drafted and prosecuted patent applications directed to immunotherapy, such as CAR T cells, including methods of manufacturing and use for treating cancers and other disorders
  • Drafted and prosecuted patent applications directed to the genetic engineering of mammals for food or therapeutic uses, and microorganisms for biofuel production
  • Drafted and prosecuted patent applications directed to recombinant molecules for diagnostics, therapeutics (including chimeric antigen receptors and antibodies and antibody derivatives), or basic research tools (e.g., nucleic acid amplification techniques)
  • Assisted a startup company with IP portfolio management during a merger and acquisition transaction for an immunotherapy technology
  • Assisted a multinational corporation with assessment of key opportunities and risks related to clean technology and related patents for a joint venture agreement
  • For a diagnostic company, conducted invalidity and noninfringement assessments of competitor patents for an IPO valuation
  • Assessed competing patents for invalidity and noninfringement for a biotechnology company’s litigation related to a gene therapy technology
  • Conducted a freedom-to-operate analysis for a biotechnology company’s novel vaccine technology

Presentations and Publications

  • Co-author, “The Rules,” IP Litigator, Volume 28 Number 6 (November/December 2022)
  • Author, “Betaine acts on a ligand-gated ion channel in the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans,” Nature Neuroscience (2013)
  • Co-author, “R-Ras regulates β1-integrin trafficking via effects on membrane ruffling and endocytosis,” BMC Cell Biology (2010)
  • Co-author, “Nonlinear optical imaging of cellular processes in breast cancer,” Microscopy and Microanalysis (2008)
  • Author, “The small GTPase R-Ras regulates organization of actin and drives membrane protrusions through the activity of PLCepsilon,” Journal of Cell Science (2006)
  • Co-author, “Dissecting autocrine effects on pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in cultured rat hypothalamic tissue,” Experimental Biology and Medicine (2004)
  • Co-author, “Leptin stimulates gonadotropin releasing hormone release from cultured intact hemihypothalami and enzymatically dispersed neurons,” Experimental Biology and Medicine (2001)
24 June 2024 PharmaPatents

USPTO Publishes Drug Patent and Exclusivity Study Report

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in conjunction with the Food and Drug Administration, and in response to January and April 2022 letters from Senator Thom Tillis, has published a report examining the time from approval of a New Drug Application until the first generic launch for 25 drug products, including consideration of patent and regulatory exclusivities.
17 January 2023 In the News

Exception to the Rule? Late Submission of Evidence as Supplemental Information Under 37 C.F.R. 42.123(b)

Foley & Lardner LLP Partner Joe Meara and Associate Aude Peden authored the article, “Exception to the Rule? Late Submission of Evidence as Supplemental Information Under 37 C.F.R. 42.123(b),” in the November/December issue of IP Litigator.
12 September 2022 Blogs

Exception to the Rule? Late Submission of Evidence as Supplemental Information Under 37 C.F.R. 42.123(b)

In PTAB trials, rules regulate when evidence may be presented by a party to ensure the opposing party a fair opportunity to respond to such evidence.
25 February 2022 Honors and Awards

Three Foley Attorneys Selected for 2022 LCLD Fellows and Pathfinder Programs

Foley & Lardner LLP is pleased to announce that Senior Counsel Jolene Fernandes has been selected as a 2022 Fellow of the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity. Additionally, Associates Mikle Jew and Aude Peden were selected for the 2022 LCLD Pathfinder Program.
30 July 2020 Blogs

Coronavirus Innovation Guideposts on the Eve of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Since, COVID-19 is not the first exposure to the deadliness of the SARS-CoV infection and in light of the rapidity with which diagnostic tests and drug products were approved for emergency use, this article explored prior research and innovation in SARS-CoV-mediated coronavirus diagnostic and therapies through patenting trends prior to the current COVID-19 pandemic.
31 January 2020 Blogs

PTAB Strict on Motivation Evidence for Obviousness

Two PTAB decisions recently designated as informative show that failure to provide detailed evidence of motivation to combine references for an obviousness challenge, can sink a Petition before or after institution of trial.